fix(profiling): ensure correct thread link #6798
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
We use the C API to retrieve the thread ID of the current thread to create a link between threads and objects. This way we protect ourselves from frameworks such as gevent that might turn thread IDs into task IDs.
P403n1x87
force-pushed
the
fix/profiler-thread-link
branch
from
70db62a to
9d230c2
Compare
sanchda
approved these changes
Aug 31, 2023
majorgreys
approved these changes
Aug 31, 2023
|
The backport to To backport manually, run these commands in your terminal: # Fetch latest updates from GitHub
git fetch
# Create a new working tree
git worktree add .worktrees/backport-1.17 1.17
# Navigate to the new working tree
cd .worktrees/backport-1.17
# Create a new branch
git switch --create backport-6798-to-1.17
# Cherry-pick the merged commit of this pull request and resolve the conflicts
git cherry-pick -x --mainline 1 827f553373d988b547913c827ed813b52ec9a119
# Push it to GitHub
git push --set-upstream origin backport-6798-to-1.17
# Go back to the original working tree
cd ../..
# Delete the working tree
git worktree remove .worktrees/backport-1.17Then, create a pull request where the |
18 tasks
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 1, 2023
We use the C API to retrieve the thread ID of the current thread to create a link between threads and objects. This way we protect ourselves from frameworks such as gevent that might turn thread IDs into task IDs. ## Testing strategy Tested with a sample application that the endpoint information is attached to profiles with this change. ## Checklist - [x] Change(s) are motivated and described in the PR description. - [x] Testing strategy is described if automated tests are not included in the PR. - [x] Risk is outlined (performance impact, potential for breakage, maintainability, etc). - [x] Change is maintainable (easy to change, telemetry, documentation). - [x] [Library release note guidelines](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes.html) are followed. If no release note is required, add label `changelog/no-changelog`. - [x] Documentation is included (in-code, generated user docs, [public corp docs](https://github.com/DataDog/documentation/)). - [x] Backport labels are set (if [applicable](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting)) ## Reviewer Checklist - [ ] Title is accurate. - [ ] No unnecessary changes are introduced. - [ ] Description motivates each change. - [ ] Avoids breaking [API](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/versioning.html#interfaces) changes unless absolutely necessary. - [ ] Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risk(s). - [ ] Change is maintainable (easy to change, telemetry, documentation). - [ ] Release note makes sense to a user of the library. - [ ] Reviewer has explicitly acknowledged and discussed the performance implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment. - [ ] Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the [release branch maintenance policy](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting) - [ ] If this PR touches code that signs or publishes builds or packages, or handles credentials of any kind, I've requested a review from `@DataDog/security-design-and-guidance`. - [ ] This PR doesn't touch any of that. (cherry picked from commit 827f553)
P403n1x87
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 1, 2023
We use the C API to retrieve the thread ID of the current thread to create a link between threads and objects. This way we protect ourselves from frameworks such as gevent that might turn thread IDs into task IDs. Tested with a sample application that the endpoint information is attached to profiles with this change. - [x] Change(s) are motivated and described in the PR description. - [x] Testing strategy is described if automated tests are not included in the PR. - [x] Risk is outlined (performance impact, potential for breakage, maintainability, etc). - [x] Change is maintainable (easy to change, telemetry, documentation). - [x] [Library release note guidelines](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes.html) are followed. If no release note is required, add label `changelog/no-changelog`. - [x] Documentation is included (in-code, generated user docs, [public corp docs](https://github.com/DataDog/documentation/)). - [x] Backport labels are set (if [applicable](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting)) - [ ] Title is accurate. - [ ] No unnecessary changes are introduced. - [ ] Description motivates each change. - [ ] Avoids breaking [API](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/versioning.html#interfaces) changes unless absolutely necessary. - [ ] Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risk(s). - [ ] Change is maintainable (easy to change, telemetry, documentation). - [ ] Release note makes sense to a user of the library. - [ ] Reviewer has explicitly acknowledged and discussed the performance implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment. - [ ] Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the [release branch maintenance policy](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting) - [ ] If this PR touches code that signs or publishes builds or packages, or handles credentials of any kind, I've requested a review from `@DataDog/security-design-and-guidance`. - [ ] This PR doesn't touch any of that. (cherry picked from commit 827f553)
18 tasks
P403n1x87
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 1, 2023
…6816) Backport of #6798 to 1.17 We use the C API to retrieve the thread ID of the current thread to create a link between threads and objects. This way we protect ourselves from frameworks such as gevent that might turn thread IDs into task IDs. ## Testing strategy Tested with a sample application that the endpoint information is attached to profiles with this change. ## Checklist - [x] Change(s) are motivated and described in the PR description. - [x] Testing strategy is described if automated tests are not included in the PR. - [x] Risk is outlined (performance impact, potential for breakage, maintainability, etc). - [x] Change is maintainable (easy to change, telemetry, documentation). - [x] [Library release note guidelines](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes.html) are followed. If no release note is required, add label `changelog/no-changelog`. - [x] Documentation is included (in-code, generated user docs, [public corp docs](https://github.com/DataDog/documentation/)). - [x] Backport labels are set (if [applicable](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting)) ## Reviewer Checklist - [x] Title is accurate. - [x] No unnecessary changes are introduced. - [x] Description motivates each change. - [x] Avoids breaking [API](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/versioning.html#interfaces) changes unless absolutely necessary. - [x] Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risk(s). - [x] Change is maintainable (easy to change, telemetry, documentation). - [x] Release note makes sense to a user of the library. - [x] Reviewer has explicitly acknowledged and discussed the performance implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment. - [x] Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the [release branch maintenance policy](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting) - [x] If this PR touches code that signs or publishes builds or packages, or handles credentials of any kind, I've requested a review from `@DataDog/security-design-and-guidance`. - [x] This PR doesn't touch any of that.
P403n1x87
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 4, 2023
Backport 827f553 from #6798 to 1.18. We use the C API to retrieve the thread ID of the current thread to create a link between threads and objects. This way we protect ourselves from frameworks such as gevent that might turn thread IDs into task IDs. ## Testing strategy Tested with a sample application that the endpoint information is attached to profiles with this change. ## Checklist - [x] Change(s) are motivated and described in the PR description. - [x] Testing strategy is described if automated tests are not included in the PR. - [x] Risk is outlined (performance impact, potential for breakage, maintainability, etc). - [x] Change is maintainable (easy to change, telemetry, documentation). - [x] [Library release note guidelines](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes.html) are followed. If no release note is required, add label `changelog/no-changelog`. - [x] Documentation is included (in-code, generated user docs, [public corp docs](https://github.com/DataDog/documentation/)). - [x] Backport labels are set (if [applicable](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting)) ## Reviewer Checklist - [x] Title is accurate. - [x] No unnecessary changes are introduced. - [x] Description motivates each change. - [x] Avoids breaking [API](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/versioning.html#interfaces) changes unless absolutely necessary. - [x] Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risk(s). - [x] Change is maintainable (easy to change, telemetry, documentation). - [x] Release note makes sense to a user of the library. - [x] Reviewer has explicitly acknowledged and discussed the performance implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment. - [x] Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the [release branch maintenance policy](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting) - [x] If this PR touches code that signs or publishes builds or packages, or handles credentials of any kind, I've requested a review from `@DataDog/security-design-and-guidance`. - [x] This PR doesn't touch any of that. Co-authored-by: Gabriele N. Tornetta <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We use the C API to retrieve the thread ID of the current thread to create a link between threads and objects. This way we protect ourselves from frameworks such as gevent that might turn thread IDs into task IDs.
Testing strategy
Tested with a sample application that the endpoint information is attached to profiles with this change.
Checklist
changelog/no-changelog.Reviewer Checklist
@DataDog/security-design-and-guidance.